Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state
Top Guidelines Of uocoming case law sanjha vs state
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
Even though the punishment could be severe, its purpose just isn't solely to seek vengeance but to discourage probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
limitation of liability into the extent of a cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)
Note: Please fill any industry and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave industry blank.
lengthy period petitioner was not regarded as for promotion, meeting in the departmental promotion committee and consider the petitioner (Promotion)
Please use 1 username and password established from the options. If it does not work please consider the other. Each allows single person access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.
Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over 1 and also a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may perhaps avoid standing trial and consequently delay the prosecution in the case. The material on record makes the case from the petitioner falls under two exceptions into the rule of grant of bail as mentioned above.
This guide supplies useful insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is established plus the employee is found guilty after owing process of regulation, it is the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the various penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness in the act of misconduct is not really satisfactory but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful fashion. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, get more info Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're with the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we are very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval with the competent authority.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (three), has become setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access towards the public to tactic the superior courts plus the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
It is also important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual size of service virtually violates all the service structure being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming this sort of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention on the legislation nor with the equity. Read more